"The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age."

Which of the following reflects the source and impact of this quote?

A. The 19th amendment protects the right to vote for all legal adults. Before this amendment, voters had to not only be an adult but also serve in the armed forces and be a high school graduate before they could vote.

B. The 26th amendment protects the right to vote for all legal adults. Before this amendment, young adults could be in college or even serving the military in combat but not be eligible to choose their leaders for a few years.

C. The 19th amendment prevents states from allowing minors to vote. Before this amendment, widespread voter fraud was an issue throughout the states, as parents would vote multiple times using their children's names.

D. The 26th amendment prevents states from allowing minors to vote. Before this amendment, candidates directed their campaigns at children and teens through cartoons rather than focusing on real political issues.

Which event in the history of the americans with disabilities act is an example of a conflict between different levels and branches of government?

Newspaper started by john campbell:

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?