In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Holmes, Jr. said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a "clear and present danger" of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case related to a limitation on which of the following? (1 point)
REVIEW GUIDELINES:

1. Freedom of the press
2. Free exercise of religion
3. Freedom of speech
4. Cruel and unusual punishment

3. Freedom of speech

Explanation:

In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Holmes, Jr. said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a "clear and present danger" of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case related to a freedom of speech. In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), it was mentioned that speech which creates clear and present danger is not protected under the first amendment. In this case Supreme court highlighted that the power of the federal government over an individual's right to freedom of speech.

The Need For a Constitution Pre-test Answers

Explanation:

1. C

2. C

3. A

4. B

5. A

6. B

7. D

8. A

9. D

100% I promise

in an absolute  monarchy, the  monarchrules as an autocrat, with absolutepower  over the state and government — for example, the right to rule by decree, promulgate laws, and impose punishments. the  monarch isnominally sovereign but the electorate, through their legislature, exercise political sovereignty.