Social Studies
Social Studies, 18.02.2020 21:54, torieegrey

Which of the following is a question which science cannot answer?

How do green plants make their own food?
How long does it take for the earth to orbit the sun?
Why does the moon have different phases?
What will be the date when the sun burns out?

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, axleon11
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00, surfskate
What were some benefits of the lewis and clark expedition?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30, jakhunter354
When were the exodus of farm workers during the depression
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, Amyra2003
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Which of the following is a question which science cannot answer?

How do green plants ma...

Questions in other subjects: