Melisa's mother gave her house to Melisa, along with a signed copy of the deed granting ownership to Melisa. Years later, Melisa decides to downsize by selling the property. The title company shows that the property is still in Melisa's mother's name. What does Melisa have to do to clear this up?

To preserve the chain of title, Melisa needs to record the signed deed. Then future records will show an unbroken chain of title.

Explanation:

Melisa cannot sell the property even though the deed granting her ownership was signed and with her. Because the property is still in her mother's name with the title company, Melisa must preserve the chain of title and record the signed deed. Once this is done, future records will then show that she did not break the chain of title but the deed transfer ownership to her, and thus she is allowed to sell it if she wants.

To preserve the chain of title, Melisa needs to record the signed deed. Then future records will show an unbroken chain of title.

Explanation:

When Melissa records the signed deeds the records will show an unbroken of chain title without that she can not sell the property

Chain of title is the official ownership record of a property or asset. Chain of ownership gets its name from its sequential nature; a chain of title traces historical title transfers from the current owner back to the original owner. This is great importance in establishing ownership of a property or asset, rigorous and accurate title records are generally kept by a centralized registry or system.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

for your question the answer would have to be france