Social Studies, 14.02.2020 03:07, AalonsoCV

In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument:
To be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. My proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. Therefore, my plan will be effective.
What kind of reasoning did Catherine use?
a. reasoning from principle
b. reasoning from analogy
c. reasoning from specific instances
d. reasoning from expediency
e. reasoning from need

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30, Wanna14ever

The passage below can be revised to make it more concise. which word is a modifier that can be eliminated because it adds no meaning? dr. madison is somewhat skeptical about stories of global warming. she has gathered scientific data in remote areas to prove her position. somewhat global scientific remote

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00, oakleylynn

Part b forty-year-old kyle wants to start investing for retirement. he wants to select a personal investment plan that will allow him to withdraw funds without paying penalties and taxes once he turns 59.5. which retirement plan should he choose? a. traditional ira b. roth ira c. 401(k)

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:20, Relesses

How long was it from the time african american men were given the right to vote until women were given the right to vote?

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00, nawafcanada

Why were colonist mad about the tea act if it actually lowered the price of tea

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument:
To be effective, law...