Provide an example of a government structure and/or policy that reflects negative freedom and an example that reflects positive freedom; and explain how each reflects that type of freedom.

Negative freedom refers to being free from something, meaning freedom from interference, whereas positive freedom refers to the ability to do something, meaning freedom to control oneself.

Explanation:

An example of negative freedom would be any law aimed to battle discrimination cases, such as classism, sexism, ageism, ableism, and racism, all of which can restrain a person's freedom. In this case, the law is there to help citicenz to be free from discrimination.

On the other hand, positive freedom is reflected in any regulation that provides those on limited incomes with resources to better their living situation. In this case, the government provides them with the ability to do something.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )