Snow Crystals Inc., a leading construction company, has constructed a skate park on government land after signing a leasing agreement with the state government. A few years later, the state authority sanctioned the Nightingale Bridge Company to build a bridge that would use the land where the skate park is already constructed. The proprietors of Snow Crystals claim that the state authority has violated the leasing agreement. Which of the following is most likely to be applied in this case between Snow Crystals Inc. and the state government.

a bridge of contract

Explanation:

A bridge of contract from the state government. Am I sure the state government before leasing out the land must have asked the company what they wanted to use the land for and for how many duration. It is obvious that duration of the agreement , I.e the duration by which the land was leased was not stated from the passage above but to draw conclusion ,the company will most likely charge the state government based on a bridge of contract agreement as they must have told the state government what they wanted to build and there must have been terms . am alsonsure that if the company actually knew that the government was going to build a bridge on that land in the coming few years, they wouldn't have invested so much in the land . so it a bridge of contract agreement.

it continues in business