Achild working intensively and individually with a speech therapist would be an example of which tier of the rti model?

Tier III

Explanation:

When a child works towards achievement of the goals of the intervention intensively and individually with a speech therapist then it is an example of the Tier III of the Response to Intervention (RTI) Model. This Tier addresses specific and significant problems and the interventions are well-defined. This is because of the intensive nature of the interventions in this Tier and the impact they can have on the child. The lower tiers of the RTI model involves collective instructions and feedback but Tier III is of individual nature.

The answer is Tier III of the RTI model.

Explanation:

A child working intensively and individually with a speech therapist would be an example of tier III of the RTI model: Tier 3 is the most appropriate because it has the greatest level of intensity in terms of support and remediation for children’s speech problems, as well as social, emotional, and academic problems.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.