Social Studies
Social Studies, 28.01.2020 17:41, ayoismeisalex

Which one of the following statements provides the most credible explanation for the fact that human beings seem to surpass all other animal species in their thinking and learning capacities? a. only human beings have the capability to make tools. b. humans communicate regularly with one another and, in doing so, pass along what they’ve learned to future generations. c. human beings have a huge repertoire of instinctual behaviors from which they can draw when they encounter new experiences. d. human brains are smaller than those of other intelligent species (e. g., elephants, dolphins) and therefore can transmit messages more quickly and efficiently.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:50, angelapegues20097
Is a notification from either a station or an ap that an existing association is terminated. select one: a. all of the above b. disassociation c. association d. reassociation
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, liqliq223
What is naturalistic about chopin's two stories, "the story of an hour" and "a pair of silk stockings"? provide textual evidence to support your claim.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00, nawafcanada
Why were colonist mad about the tea act if it actually lowered the price of tea
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Which one of the following statements provides the most credible explanation for the fact that human...

Questions in other subjects: