Christopher is a 5-month-old american exposed solely to english. according to the research, which statement would we expect to be true regarding his speech perception?

The question is not complete, but I will be explaining one or two things here so that you will be able to tackle a similar question.

Explanation:

According to researches conducted by neuroscientists, it has been observed that children process language since birth( even since when they are in the womb).

According to the question, Christopher is a 5-month-old American and he is exposed solely to English language. If Christopher hears another different language, he would know that the new language is different what the normal(English) that he has been listening to for some times. Christopher would have been processing the information of the English language, so he will be able to know that he is now listening to a different language. Infants have some kind of ''phonetic stimuli' controlled by the Brain.

CONCLUSION: INFANTS ARE ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE SOUNDS OF  ANY LANGUAGE.

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.