Distance is to as familiarity is to

a. the propinquity effect; opposites attract
b. functional distance; complementary attraction
c. the propinquity effect; the mere exposure effect
d. romantic love; the mere exposure effect

None of the above

Explanation:

Distance is to functional distance as familiarity is to the propinquity effect. Familiarity and propinquity effect are notable concept in the study of interpersonal attraction.

Functional distance in the study works with distance and explains one's attraction to another depending on far or near this person is to him. The propinquity effect on the other hand, which is identified with familiarity in the question, is one's attraction to someone they meet frequently and have gotten used to. The options in the question above do not satisfy the answers correctly.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )