Which one of these does not pose a risk to security at a government facility? (antiterrorism scenario training, page 2)

1. a person found in an inappropriate location of the facility inattentive guard personnel
2. a visitor showing an unusual interest in details of security procedures
3. an "escort required" visitor found without an escort
4. a person expressing boredom with the us mission

A person expressing boredom with the United States mission does NOT pose risk to security at a government facility.

Option 1

All government facilities whether it is parliamentary or police station are exposed in danger always. The danger of terrorism, bombing, riots, sabotage, unlawful activities, etc. To protect these facilities government of the country take good care of the security of these centres and the staff working there.

In the given question all the given options are contributing in risk for the security of government facility except the boredom of a person from United States program because there is no way that a person's boredom can harm the government work and centres in any major way, so it cause no threat for the security of these facilities and the government of the nation.

chavez's example shows that nonviolent protest can work well. it shows that one nonviolent man can stop a mob, which proves chavez's point and persuades people to protest nonviolently.