As interpreted by the us supreme court which of the following individual rights is not guaranteed by the bill of rights? 1. a right to have an attorney2. a right to an appeal3. a right to a trial by jury***4. a right to due process5. i believe it is a right to a trial am i right? if not can you explain why?

The correct answer is 2) A right to an appeal.

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States declares in the sixth amendment that in criminal proceedings the defendant is entitled to a rapid and public trial by an impartial jury of the state where the crime was committed, also, they will have the right to a lawyer for their defense and to present witnesses.

On the other hand, the right to an appeal is not guaranteed in the declaration of rights; the appeal is carried out after the resolution of a case in which the party that requires the appeal does not agree with the decision, and makes the appeal, the judge or the court of justice will decide if they accept, after reviewing the sentence and evidence.

Therefore, the appeal can not be taken as a right, since a right must be granted to all persons such as the right to a lawyer; instead, in the appeal a judge or court decides if they give the right to appeal.

I hope this information can help you.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.