According lippi-green's 1997 article, she compares the language acquisition process to a child beginning to build a house.

The answer is: She compares the language acquisition process to a child beginning to build a sound house.

Explanation:

Lippi-Green is an American writer and academic that has focused on the study of sociolinguistics, accent and discriminatory practices, in her book "English with an accent: language, ideology and discrimination in the United States", published in 1997, she explores the relationship between language and ideology and the social construction of an accent.

In this book, she uses the metaphor of a sound house to explain children's language acquisition process, which changes over the years from the child's first words until he is approximately 20 years old. She uses this metaphor alongside other architectural concepts to illustrate how a child's accent changes asit resembles the onfe of the people closest to the child.

Sound house

Explanation:

Lippi-Green in 1997 discussed about standard English Language. She described that definition stardard English language as a "nuisance". Lippi-Green argues that the definition given to the so-called standard English Language has unfairly left out a vast majority of English speakers.

On the the page 58, Lipp-Green, it says and I quote; '' no regional accent; who reside in the midwest, far west or perhaps some parts of the northeast (but never in the south); with more than average or superior education...''

She compared the language acquisition process to a child beginning to build a sound house which is what's reffered to as Ascent.

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.