Social Studies
Social Studies, 28.12.2019 06:31, ratpizza

A. briefly explain one major difference between acuna’s and graebner’s historical interpretations of the debates over origins of the mexican-american war in the 1840s.
b. briefly explain how one development in the 1840s or 1850s not directly mentioned in the passages supports acuna’s argument.
c. briefly explain how one development in the 1840s or 1850s not directly mentioned in the passages supports graebner’s argument.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:20, baltazmapa629n
Emily naturally blinks whenever her sister pretends she is going to poke her in the eye. her sister, a psychology major, then decides to have a little fun. she pairs the word “psychology” (neutral stimulus) with pretending to poke emily in the eye (unconditioned stimulus), which automatically makes emily blink (unconditioned response). soon, emily blinks as soon as she hears the word “psychology.” when emily blinks when hearing the word “psychology,” even when her sister does not pretend to poke her in the eye, the word “psychology’ is now the
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:00, Savageboyn
Who is the speaker in this excerpt from book 13 of homer’s odyssey, and what inference can you make from the tone?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00, dbanks701
How would having more railroad tracks be advantageous during a war
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, Amyra2003
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
A. briefly explain one major difference between acuna’s and graebner’s historical interpretations of...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 05:30