"in the interest of all america and even the world, i will lower all taxes, increase jobs, and make the quality of life two times better than is has ever been in this state." this statement is an example of:
a) glittering generalities
b) name calling
c) card stacking
d) transfer

The given statement is an example of glittering generalities

Option A

Explanation:

The 'glittering' in the glittering generalities denotes the glowing embarkment of the statement, This is a general term that glows the value of the statement more than its being factual in presence. This is the reason, it is also known as glowing generality.

The phrase appears very appealing either in substance or demand or emotion and is involved within the conceptual purview of the ideal belief without having to be any justified association with reasonable information or basal support. The same appears in the given statement.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )