Which explains how african american civil rights leader marcus garvey might respond to this quote? we do not want the men of another color for our brothers-in-law, but we do want them for our brothers.

a. he would applaud the author for arguing in favor of a passive approach to racial equality.
b. he would condemn the author for implying that interracial marriage is wrong.
c. he would support the author for suggesting that racial equality is an impossibility.
d. he would criticize the author for supporting integration of the races, not separation.

A

Explanation:

He would applaud the author for arguing in favor of a passive approach to racial equality.

We do not want the men of another color for our brothers-in-law, but we do want them for our brothers.

According to the statement above we can explain that they really want a mixed color family, although those men are brother-in-law, they are parts of the family, really brothers in heart same way.

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.