Social Studies
Social Studies, 24.12.2019 02:31, ramberson101

Even though esmeralda was able to say all of her lines for the upcoming play without any errors in last night’s rehearsal, her director insists that she run through them completely at least five additional times before opening night. what technique is the director recommending in this case?

a. overlearning
b. massed practice
c. method of loci
d. link method

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00, godchaux15395
Name two things the mycenaeans learned from the minoans
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30, QTpieNay
You swipe your debit card too many times. what additional charges should you expect?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00, MannyRaw55
What changes occurred over time that was over directly to this event? alice paul an the woman’s suffrage movement
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Even though esmeralda was able to say all of her lines for the upcoming play without any errors in l...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 20.01.2022 19:50
Konu
Computers and Technology, 20.01.2022 19:50