Reading the news on the internet, johan comes across the headline, "when stress is increased, men rush ahead, women more cautious." (this headline is based on a study conducted by lighthall et al., 2011.) in this study, men and women were asked to perform a decision task as many times as possible in a set period, in either a stressed or unstressed condition. in the unstressed condition, men and women performed similarly. however, in the stressed condition, the number of decision tasks performed by menincreased while the number performed by women decreased.
which of the following is a variable in this study?
a. the amount of stress
b. the cause of the stress
c. the length of the set period
d. the decision task type

Which of the following is true of emotions? (a) a neurologically-intact baby can show at least six distinct emotions at birth. (b) the character of emotions changes as we develop cognitively. (c) basic emotions are culturally- and developmentally-based. (d) in general, adults cannot interpret infant emotions until the infants are 10 to 12 months old.

Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.