Jose, who was trained as a high-school teacher in mexico, immigrated to a large city in the united states ten years ago. he now works two minimum wage jobs to make ends meet, and his health is declining. how might a sociologist explain this?
a. jose’s decline in health is inevitable due to his family’s health history.
b. jose’s traditional mexican diet is unhealthy.
c. jose’s health is declining because he makes poor decisions.
d. jose’s economic class status is associated with poor health.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.