An opponent of the citizens united v. federal election commission ruling would most likely agree with which statement?
a. congress does not have the right to limit any group's ability o express its political opinion.
b. corporations have a first amendment right to spend their money to support candidates.
c. even independent cooperate campaign spending can lead to political corruption.
d. political leaders are unlikely o grant favors to those who give them campaign contributions.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What has contributed to the growth of agriculture as big business in the midwest

One result of recent migration trends is that the workforce in europe has become