Social Studies, 05.12.2019 22:31, triciamarler
Sometimes a person looks to others to determine whether needs to be offered in an ambiguous situation. when this person incorrectly concludes that no is necessary, this is called ignorance.
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:00, terrybrown5391
Me ☺️ i would appreciate it. “ explain who the following groups were: a)federalist b) anti-federalist” i really need
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, KittyLitty
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Sometimes a person looks to others to determine whether needs to be offered in an ambiguous situati...
Social Studies, 05.10.2020 01:01
Health, 05.10.2020 01:01
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 01:01
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 01:01
Physics, 05.10.2020 01:01