You own university heights apartments, a business that rents primarily to students. one evening, your tenant sharon is attacked by an intruder who forces the lock on the sliding glass door of her ground-floor apartment. sharon’s screams attract the attention of darryl, your resident manager, who comes to sharon’s aid. together, he and sharon drive the intruder off, but not before they are both badly cut by the intruder. is the intruder liable for what he has done? do you have legal responsibilities to sharon and darryl? what should you consider doing at your apartments

The government of country c has passed a law protecting the physical safety of factory workers. this is an example of monetary policy. supply and demand. fiscal policy. regulatory policy.

You think all professors are uncoordinated, but then you see your social psychology professor make a diving catch down the left-field line at an intramural softball game against the arts department team. you also notice that your professor hits lead-off for the team and is able to score from second base on a ground-out. you maintain your original stereotype of professors as uncoordinated by deciding that this one individual is an exception to the rule because he is a “young professor.” this is an example of

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.