Question 1 options: france and tunisia both have mediterranean climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. in france is takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to harvest a tomato. tunisian workers only need one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. assume there are only two workers and each worker works 40 hours a week. a) which country has the absolute advantage in green beans? france b) which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes? tunisian c) which country has a comparative advantage in green beans? france d) which country has the comparative advantage in tomatoes? tunisian e) how much would france have to give up in terms of producing tomatoes to gain from trade? 20 tomato(s) f) should france give up producing green beans to produce tomatoes? (yes/no)

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; 55-85;