Lapiere's study in the early 1930s involving travel with a chinese couple to places of business indicated that most people who participated in the follow up questionnaire
a. all weather liberals
b. reluctant liberals
c. all weather bigots
d. timid bigots

Can one nation or empire take over another nation without oppressing others? explain has imperialism become more or less oppressive as the world has become more industrialized? explain is it possible in an era of many democratic societies and advanced technology for nations to gain power without oppressing others? that is, can nations avoid denying people their rights? explain

Nelson is creating a powerpoint about the structural-functional perpectivebon poverty what perspective should he include in his presentation?

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?