Nathan was sent to his room for hitting his sister. later, his mother went to his room to talk with him about more acceptable ways in which he can express his anger. which of the following parenting styles does this scenario exemplify?
a. indulgent parenting
b. neglectful
c. authoritative
d. authoritarian

c) authoritative

Explanation:

There are 4 different styles of parenting:

Both Authoritative and authoritarian styles of parenting focus on authority, this means that they set rules and expect their children to follow the rules.

However, the authoritarian parenting is a cold style of parenting which doesn't allow for questions from the kids ("because I say so") so there is a one directional style of communication. These parents focus on punishing the wrong behavior and they believe in total control and lack of independence from their children.

Authoritative parents are nurturing so they are warmer than the Authoritarian parents, they allow children to ask why so they explain limits by reasoning with their kids, they also focus on teaching the right behaviors rather than punishing the wrong ones and when there are wrong behaviors they focus on consequences rather than on punishments.

Permissive/Indulgent parents think "kids will be kids" so they tend to be very forgiving when it comes to rules and they don't usually set consequences, but, when they do, they don't really stick to them.

Uninvolved/neglectful parents are cold and distant but also they don't expect much from their children so, basically, their children lack attention, and we can say they are neglected.

In this example, Nathan was sent to his room for hitting his sister, thus, we can see that his parents set rules and expect their kids to follow them.

Later, his mom went to talk with him about more acceptable ways in which he can express his anger, we can see that she is focusing on teaching the right behaviors rather than punishing the wrong ones.

Thus, we can conclude that this is an example of c) authoritative parenting style.

so, colonists did not want to pay any taxes.  

colonists did not consider themselves british citizens.  

colonists felt no sense of obligation to britain.  

colonists objected to violations of their natural rights. are the answer choices?

the language of nature was a manifestation from god as he said "let there be light" and there was light the world began to assume visible, comprehensible form.

what ever we know now think of the old vision of creation we can be sure that with out the speaking of word -without language- we would have no science today with its striking power to illuminate the world.