Herb, a tennis player, has been struggling to develop a more consistent serve. he made the following remark to his partner during the second set of a recent match: "i feel like i'm making progress. i haven't double-faulted once today." he then served two double-faults, which caused him to say, "every time i say i haven't double-faulted, i immediately start to." herb's perception may have been influenced by:

It may have been influenced by the fact he said he was making improvements and specifically stated he wasn't serving double-fault.

Explanation: There's a theory in psychology named 'self-fulfilling-prophecy'; it states that when someome is trying to avoid something at all cost, it then happens just because all the things that the person wasn't supponse to do, they did unconsciously.

In this case, Hebb was trying so hard to avoid double-faulting that he unconsciously prepared the scenario to fail.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; the trial de novo