In the last one week, may and phyllis have been putting in extra hours at work so that the project assigned to them is completed on time. though the manager was due to assign two more people to this project, he had not done so and, instead, was emphasizing to employees the importance of adhering to the needs of the department in regard to workload. as a result, may and phyllis, who had double their routine workload, complained to the division manager. may was promptly suspended from work for complaining about her immediate supervisor. this scenario describes power.

How did world war i contribute to the events leading up to world war ii? (a)germans wanted to expand their nation to regain territory in the soviet union. (b)britain and france wanted to force germany to make reparation payments. (c)germans hated the versailles treaty and supported hitler's actions to defy it. (d)the soviet union wanted to take over german territory in eastern europe.

Why do all market economies have taxes to support armed forces police forces public schools and at least some form of public transportation?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.