How might a conflict theorist critique the concentric zone model? group of answer choices a. the model fails to show the gentrification of neighborhoods as the upper classes start to take over poorer neighborhoods. b. the model fails to take into account all the parks and playgrounds in the city. c. the model does not show any careful city planning that usually takes place when a city is born. d. the model fails to explore areas of overlap where a business might be located in a suburb or people might live above their businesses in the city.

a. The model fails to show the gentrification of neighborhoods as the upper classes start to take over poorer neighborhoods.

Explanation:

The concentric zone model was the first one to give an explanation of distribution of social groups in urban areas.

This model divides urban areas in different zones:

The conflict theory states that there is a constant struggle between the rich and the poor and the rich people will protect the resources they have access to making it more difficult for the poor to have access to those same resources.

Conflict theory focuses in the differences between poor people and rich people.

We can see that the Concentric Zone model doesn't mention the differences between poor and rich in any of the zones.

Thus, a critic that a conflict theorist could do would be that the CZM fails to show the gentrification of neighborhoods as the upper classes start to take over poorer neighborhoods.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

all you have to do is look at the pictures to find hope this is the lesson you were also hope this .