Your classmate, whose part-time job entails reorganizing the paleoanthropology lab on campus, asks you to take a look at a skeleton that she thinks is that of a primate. after noting the absence of a postorbital bar, nails, and an opposable thumb, what would be a valid statement to make?

After noting the absence of a postorbital bar, nails, and an opposable thumb, a valid statement to make is that the skeleton is not of a primate. It is the skeleton of a plesiadapiform. Dermoptera and the primates emerged within this plesiadapiforms. Besides, Primates had a skull bounded by a postorbital bar and hands and feet for grasping, features that plesiadapiforms lacked.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

1. government controls industry through policy

2.government is both a consumer and a producer

4. government can use policy t influence economy

i did this!