Ahmi was a witness in a lawsuit. when asked why he fired rana, ahmi replied, "rana was fired for willful misconduct." indeed, rana had not engaged in any misconduct. rana will be able to successfully sue ahmi for defamation based on what ahmi said in court.
a) true
b) false

True

Explanation:

Defamation, is the making of a false statement concerning a person or a  business, that could damage that person's or business's reputation.  Defamation could be both written and/or oral statements. If the  defamaroty statement is written, it's normally called libel. And if it's  verbal then it's called slander. If someone is making false statements  about a person or business, its reputation could be severely damaged. If  this happens, legal consequences could be taken in consideration. In  conclusion, in this particular case, it is true that Rana could sue  Ahmi for defamation in a court.  

usually, however, secession was popular enough without the of community leaders. prominent unionists, on the other hand, were a major reason that texas did not secede before march 1861. the most important of these was sam houston, the governor of the state from 1859 to 1861.

can i have brainlest

delete this messag epls it wont let me out this exit