The "nature vs. nurture" debate has influenced sociological perspectives and spawned two primary explanations pertaining to the roots of human behavior and dominant social arrangements. the explanation that asserts human behavior occurs within highly influential social contexts and that human behavior is nearly inseparable from the context in which it occurs is consistent with the:

The answer is: It is consistent with the nurture perspective.

Explanation:

The nurture perspective, as opposed to the nature perspective, states that in order to understand human behavior one must focus on the social context, for which it is nearly inseparable from the context in which it occurs.

The nurture perspective has brought a new dimension in the study of social problems such as delinquency or addiction; before the nature vs. nurture debate began, it whas believed that these conducts were inherent to the person that presented the behavior, that it was in their nature. Now, it is known that the social context and problems such as poverty, play a strong role in the development of certain behaviors.

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.

idk if you found them already or not but you probably did but the one closer to sea level is raleigh.