You notice that an association of nursing homes in your county has an active twitter account. your association has been having trouble getting them involved in emergency preparation drills, so you decide to monitor their accounts, to follow their tweets and participate in the conversation when appropriate. by doing so you are able to:
a. reach a larger group of constituents
b. build community resilience through prevention, mitigation and preparedness efforts by promotion of participation in government
c. communicate more directly and effectively with constituents
d. save lives through rapid communication

Which option below best represents what is included in the calculation of the united states gross domestic product (gdp)? a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

The citizens if the united states live and work in a