The convenience of wikipedia makes it a popular reference for students. after several instances in which students cited incorrect information, however, the history department at middlebury college prohibited references to wikipedia articles in papers or exams. did the middlebury college history department go too far? what is the proper role, if any, for wikipedia in academic research?

Answer and Explanation:

The action taken by the department of Middlebury history is right as Wikipedia is a source of information on which ordinary people contribute to the content of the posts. We may say that the fact that its sources can be used in tests or articles is not so accurate.

It must be utilized as a learning get-together apparatus just and the data one get from their ought to be affirmed from some dependable source.

dude the first thing it says is that copied answers will get a zero. plus it would take anyone on an incredibly long time to answer. ive seen 2 people asking the exact same question and their questions got taken down. i have the assignment too, and im in the progress of doing it. i suggest going to a more private website, because this is the first place teachers look.