Social Studies
Social Studies, 29.10.2019 03:31, alexisbcatlett14

Even though the authors point to a number of situational variables that contributed to the destructive obedience of stanley milgram's participants (e. g., normative and informational conformity pressures, conflicting norms), it might still be argued that people have, lurking deep within them, sadistic tendencies that can easily be elicited by situational variables. what experimental findings by milgram call this "personal attribution" into question?
a. when participants could choose the level of shock, they administered very low levels.
b. violent prisoners administered lower shocks than non-prisoner participants.
c. there are cultural differences in the amount of shock participants administer.
d. when the learner was introduced as a minister, participants gave lower shocks.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50, seannasal2804
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population. the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors. the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:10, antcobra
Those with high self-esteem are highly critical of their strengths and weaknesses. true or false
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10, moncho6222
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10, mitch729
The economy of the united states is best described as
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Even though the authors point to a number of situational variables that contributed to the destructi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 14.02.2022 14:00
Konu
English, 14.02.2022 14:00