"blow up." jeanie is hauling gas in the back of her pick-up truck for her personal watercraft. she is planning a lake party and thinks she will need a lot of it. on the way home, jeanie stops at the automatic teller machine at her bank and exits her car. holly pulls behind her and negligently rear-ends jeanie's pick-up. the truck explodes and results in the bank building burning to the ground. the bank sues holly for negligence claiming that holly should have to pay for the entire bank building. the bank claimed that it should be able to recover under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.

which of the following is true regarding whether actual cause exists in the bank's action against holly?
a. actual causation would exist because the bank would not have been burnt down if holly had fulfilled her duty to drive properly.
b. holly is not the proximate cause of the bank burning because it was not foreseeable that jeanie would have gas in the back of her pick-up truck that would result in such a fire.
c. the bank is incorrect because the issue here is causation, not whether there was a lack of due care.

Awife was having an affair with her neighbor. the wife and her husband had a prenuptial agreement that prevented the wife from receiving any of the husband’s sizable fortune in the event of a divorce. the wife and her neighbor formed a plan to murder the husband and run away together with the wife’s inheritance. the neighbor shot the husband one evening, killing him instantly, then drove to a town 100 miles away and checked into a motel. later that night, the police showed up at the motel with a valid warrant for the neighbor’s arrest. after the neighbor was arrested and placed in a police car, the police asked the motel clerk for permission to search the room, and the clerk granted the request. the police found the gun hidden in the tank of the toilet. the wife and the neighbor were each charged with first-degree murder and tried separately. at her trial, the wife sought to suppress any evidence of the gun, arguing that it was seized illegally. what is the prosecution’s strongest response to this argument? athe motel clerk gave the police permission to search the room. bthe wife was not staying in the motel room where the gun was found. cthe gun was found in a search incident to a lawful arrest. dthe neighbor did not have a reason

Explain the term minorities ? why do they lag behind the majority community both educationally and economically ? how can they get their rightful place in society

The belmont principle of beneficence requires that: a. subjects derive individual benefit from study participation. b. potential benefits justify the risks of harm. c. the study makes a significant contribution to generalizable knowledge. d. risks are managed so that they are no > minimal.