Jane sent her boss an email suggesting that they have a performance review to see whether she was ready for a raise. her boss replied in an email that jane was out of line and that she would give her a performance review at the same time as other employees. face-to-face communication may have jane avoid upsetting her boss bya. allowing her to pressure her boss by looking her straight in the eye. b.allowing her to respond to her boss's anger in real time. c.allowing jane to claim gender discrimination without putting it in writing. d.allowing her to evaluate her boss's body language before suggesting she was ready for a raise.

d.allowing her to evaluate her boss's body language before suggesting she was ready for a raise.

Explanation:

There are several ways of communication between two or more people. Email is a non-presential communication tool that can be very useful in many situations, especially when there is a physical distance between the interlocutors. Verbal communication is direct, face to face. It is a form of communication where people can evaluate each other's body expressions and signals. That way, if Jane had personally asked her director, maybe she could assess if this was the right time for that. If the boss was clearly annoyed, it would be better to wait. If he was happy, maybe it was the right time. By email it is not possible to make this assessment.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the period of human evolution has coincided with environmental change, including ('hominin' refers to any bipedal species closely related to humans – that is, on how do we know earth's climate has changed? a map showing dates and locations of prehistoric archeological sites and migration routes from africa into.