In 1917, the us government passed the trading with the enemy act, the espionage act and then in 1918, the sedition act. each of these acts dealt with "protecting" the us from our enemies in world war i. in your opinion, were these acts necessary and protective or did they infringe upon the first amendment rights of americans?

Due to the State of War, these meassures were necessary from a military perspective to protect the rearguard.

Explanation:

Due to the immigrant base of American society during the period, vivid fear of "fifth columns" were rooted in the USA. However, it can also be argued that these acts were the first act of reflecting the limits of the democratic process when confronted to the so-called "national interest". So, if you agree with the need of the nation, you can justify these meassures to protect the interests of the State (which can also be the ones of the dominant elite).

u.s. presidents buried at arlington national cemetery include john f. kennedy and william howard taft. the kennedy gravesite is the final resting place not only of the former president, but also his wife jackie kennedy, his two brothers robert and edward kennedy, as well as a memorial to his brother joe jr.good luck

explanation:

hello,

answer: a federal government has final authority on interstate/inter provincial  and international affairs, a confederation is one where the central/national government or authority is governing body what does not have final say over the same matters. hopefully this and i will try again if you don't like this answer : )

best of luck!