Case: deshaney v. winnebago, 489 u. s. 189 (1989

1) explain the facts of the case. what is at issue for the supreme court to decide?

2) what is the rationale used by the court in deciding the case

3) what was the majority decision?

4) summarize the argument of the dissenting position(s).

5) how does this case relate to social problems?

6) what are the implications or possible applications of this case to other relatedsituations regarding social problems, broadly defined? be creative. think about what if the case took place in 2018.

7) do you agree with the ruling? do you agree with the rationale for it used by the court or in concurring and dissenting opinions? explain your reasoning with examples from the decision to illustrate.

!

According to the federal regulations, which of the following studies meets the definition of research with human subjects? a study of twenty 4th grade classrooms in which researchers ask the schools to systematically vary the time of day reading is taught, and collect weekly assessments of reading comprehension for each child over a three-month period. the collection of data, by a playground designer hired by the superintendent of schools, about the physical dimensions of school playgrounds, presence of fencing, and the kinds of equipment currently provided. a feasibility study for implementing a year-round school program, focusing on economic issues such a facilities utilization and transportation costs. an analysis of aggregate data comparing statewide high school graduation rates provided by the state department of public instruction, using county tax information.

During the course of a raid, communication between swat team members suffered as excessive static overwhelmed radios. within the communication process, this static can be viewed as it interfered with the communication.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.