Jacobi is visiting sheila at her apartment while she is redecorating, and sheila asks him if he would like to buy her two sofas that she is replacing. sheila tells jacobi that the sofas are in great condition and are the most comfortable she has ever had. she acknowledges that some of the fabric on the sofas is slightly worn but says that is their only issue. jacobi buys the sofas on the spot, but once they are back at his house he finds that one of them is infested with bed bugs. jacobi has to throw out the infested sofa and pay a special exterminator to come and get rid of the insects. jacobi sues sheila. assume their jurisdiction follows the majority approach. how will the court rule?

   If Sheila had a reasonable belief that she was telling the truth, Jacobi can rescind the contract, but he cannot collect damages.

Explanation:  From the given text it can be concluded that Sheila did not intend to deceive Jacobi, that is, she was telling the truth when she claimed that the sofas were in good condition, except that the only issue was that the fabric on the sofas was slightly worn. Because this is an unintentional mistake, that is, Sheila's claim that everything else with the sofas is okay, Jacobi can rescind the contract but cannot collect damages.

the president has the power to appoint federal judges, ambassadors, and other "principal officers” of the united states, subject to senate confirmation of such appointments.

1. state-issued photo ids. provide them for free for those who can't afford them.

2. the system we have seems to be working nearly perfectly. seems like about 31 cases per billion votes cast

3. the national policy for hiring new employees which requires proof of eligibility to work. there are something like 20 types of identification which can be used for this.