Which of the following is true about the special education category of emotional disturbance (ed)?
education is the only field which uses the category of emotional disturbance (ed).
children and youth can be excluded from services for ed if they are determined to be "socially maladjusted."
children with schizophrenia can be served in schools under the ed label.
all of the above.

Children and youth can be excluded from services for ED if they are determined to be "socially maladjusted."

Explanation:

What is the definition of emotional disturbance?

According to the federal law the official definition of emotional disturbance is the situation in which the performance of a child in education has been greatly impacted by the following: (1) they are not able to learn and there is no explanation to why they are not able to learn (2) They have issue making relationship with others or relating in normal way with people around them , (3)They behave inappropriately and display their feeling inaccurately (4) unhappiness/depression, or (5) they also display psychological imbalance

However federal law state that children who only have issues with following rules or who break rules those are said to be socially maladjusted and they can not be included under emotional disturbance category.

The difference between the two is that socially maladjusted children decide not to abide by the given behaviour standards whilst emotionally disturbed children do not possess the mental state to follow the given behavioural standards even if they want to.

Some do argue though against this saying that even socially maladjusted kids do have some signs that are counted under emotional disturbance so it could probably be more effective theorically than practically.

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.