Read the excerpt from we shall not be moved.
how would a careful rereading of this excerpt a reader
understand the "league" mentioned in the first sentence?
the league, like local 25, had expected a turnout of four or
five thousand. they were bowled over by this army, utterly
unprepared for it. they had organized strikes in the garment
trade, small ones, usually confined to a single shop, but
never before had they undertaken something on so vasta
scale. they might fail, might be laughed at by the whole of
new york as well as john dyche and the ilgwu men, and
all the same they knew this was the challenge they'd been
hoping for their chance to show the world they were more
than highbrow butters-in, just as the shirtwaist makers were
more than irresponsible little girls.
the reader could make the connection between the
"league" and the word "bowled" in the second sentence to
conclude that they are a bowling team.
the reader could make the connection between the
"league" and "shirtwaist makers" in the last sentence to
realize they are the same group of women.
the reader could make the connection between the
"league" and the third sentence, which explains that they
"organized strikes in the garment trade."
the reader could make the connection between the
"league" and the "ilgwu men" in the last sentence to
note that they are both parts of the same group.

credit card number 4 is the right answer

the correct answer is the following is a list of inventions made in the medieval islamic world, especially during the "islamic golden age" (8th to 13th centuries),[1][2] as well as the late medieval period, especially in the emirate of granada and the ottoman empire.

science and technology in the islamic world adopted and preserved knowledge and technologies from contemporary and earlier civilizations, including persia, india, china, and greece-roman antiquity, while making a number of improvements and innovations.

states grant a variety of local governments power to meet residents’ needs (source: apex learning). hope this !

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.