Can you think of an ethical principal that would prohibit the killing, hurting, sacrificing, or eating of humans for the sake of other ends that would not equally pertain to animals?

Explanation:

There is two justification for this ethical principle:

Comparative justification:

This is an oft-cited justification for the consumption of animal meat. When there is a question arisen about why an animal eating is morally justified then the opinion given that comparison between humans eating animals and animals eating animals. Often we could not base our moral judgments regarding the acceptability of certain actions.  

Dominion based justification:

This justification goes with the men eating have slightly considered depending on the wider look for the world.  

the historians cited in the article all agree with one another about the cause of the civil war. despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, the historians agree that slavery was the root cause of the civil war. the fact that all these historiansgenerally agree with one another makes their shared viewpoints more reliable and valid, especially because the historians have different backgrounds and all work for the well-respected institutions of howard university, clemson university, and the university of colorado.

answer; george herbert mead;