Is it morally right for a vegetarian to eat an animal cracker?

The correct answer to the question lies in the fact that vegetarians, and most vegan trends, do not eat any product in which animal meat, produce that is meant to feed young animals (like milk), and products in which animal labor has been used, can be consumed.

Because all these are principles and values on which the vegan and vegetarian lifestyles are based, then the moral question becomes if the product to be consumed may have any of these conditions in it, or not. From here, will they be able to tell if eating something specific is morally right or not. And because there are so many different vegetarian and vegan ideologies that vary on minute details, the moral question really comes down to if the consumption of such an item violates one of their principles.

Since essentially an animal cracker is made out of parts of animals, like bone remains, since the vegan principle is not to consume anything that comes from an animal´s body, then, it would not be morally right to consume that cracker. However, if the cracker is a simple one, with no animal body parts involved, and it is simple wheat, or another grain, then it would be morally right.

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.