Social Studies, 20.09.2019 00:20, eggoysters

Antimaterialists tend to deride the importance of "things." yet, things are highly significant, not merely because of their functional utility but also because of their psychological impact. we develop relationships with things. things affect our sense of continuity or discontinuity. they play a role in the structure of situations, and the oreshortening of our relationships with things accelerates the pace of life. (alvin toffler, future shock)
a. nonargument.
b. argument; conclusion: we develop relationships with things.
c. argument; conclusion: antimaterialists tend to "things."
d. argument; conclusion: yet things are highly significant.
e. argument; conclusion: they play a role the pace of life.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30, Knownothing

What impact did improvements in farming technology near the end of the nineteenth century have on the american economy? a. more energy was needed to power equipment, creating the renewable energy industry. b. less labor was necessary on farms, leading workers to pursue other jobs. c. less money was invested in farming as many locally owned farms went bankrupt. d. more demand for agricultural products reduced the price of food and animal products.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40, ariannanykole1

The president’s role in a political party is to set the legislative agenda true or false

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40, lakiyalundy57

Which is relatively better: a score of 76 on a psychology test or a score of 22 on an economics test? scores on the psychology test have a mean of 90 and a standard deviation of 13. scores on the economics test have a mean of 52 and a standard deviation of 10.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30, avilaaa

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Antimaterialists tend to deride the importance of "things." yet, things are highly significant, not...