One of the most dramatic moments in the gita is the exchange between arjuna and krishna, about whether it's philosophically justifiable to lay down one's arms and refuse to fight. what is each character's position? which do you feel most comfortable with, and why?

Arjuna feels it is sin to kill anyone or she'd blood for the kingdom that he doesn't even wants from the first place .

Krishna believes this is not real killing someone because a person doesn't even die he just get separated from the body as the body dies and the soul is released to face their karma.

Krishna convinces Arjuna that this is just preparation for karma.

I feel more comfortable with Arjuna why kill for the Kingdom that you don't even desired from the first place .

Taking a soul is rather a harsh way of getting things done nomatter what the reason may be .

I stand with the right to life .

Explanation:

according to hess's theory, when the magma cooled, it would expand and push the tectonic plates apart. it would push the north and south america plates to the west and eurasia and africa ones to the east. the atlantic ocean would get wider but the coastlines of the masses would stay the same.

harry hammond hess was a geologist and a united states navy officer in the second world war. he is considered to be one of the founding fathers of the theory of plate tectonics. he is known for his theories on sea floor spreading, stating that the movement of the continents was the result of see floor spreading. the continents are attached to the plates and do not move separately. the plates themselves shift and change shape, carrying the continents along.