Suppose that jack makes an offer to sell the restaurant on july 10th. hal and sophia decide to think it over. on july 15th, they mail a letter of acceptance to jack. on july 16th, hal and sophia change their mind and call jack, stating that they do not want to purchase the business. on july 20th, jack receives the letter of acceptance. would there be a valid contract?

The correct answer would be, Yes a valid contract has been formed between them on July 15th when the letter of acceptance was sent.

Explanation:

Jacks makes an offer to sell his restaurant on July 10th, and on July 15th, Hall and Sophie mailed him the letter of acceptance. But on the very next day they called Jack and told him that now they don't want to purchase the restaurant. But because they have already signed the contract on 15th of July and it was a legal document, not a verbal one, so it means that both parties are now in a valid contract, as Hal and Sophie sent Jack the contract of acceptance after signing it.

i believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the role of campaign committees is to act as a bridge between state and local campaigns.

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.