In her interview with dalton conley, julia adams talks about the differences between sociology and history. as a self-identified historical comparative sociologist, adams makes the point that sociologists are less concerned with uniqueness than they are with commonalities. consider henry the viii of england during the mid-1500s. henry's succession of marriages (six wives in all) is often seen as a unique case. six wives is a lot by the norms of many european societies. a sociologist, however, might well look at it by considering the ways in which henry's marriages

The government of country c has passed a law protecting the physical safety of factory workers. this is an example of monetary policy. supply and demand. fiscal policy. regulatory policy.

Which party do you think would best fit your personal ideology and views? pick one of the two parties and explain three issues from that party's platform that you agree with.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?