The paradox of analysis shows that a philosophical analysis is necessarily true and knowable a priori testable by the method of counterexample either false or uninformative false and uninformative trivially true.

either false or uninformative

Explanation:

According to my research on the paradox of analysis, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it is either false or uninformative. This paradox, concerns itself by how an analysis can be both correct and informative. Philosophical analysis according to this paradox are usually one or the other, or none.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

this is not a question

answer; control group;