Social Studies, 02.09.2019 17:30, Supermonkey6425
Melvin t. smith was tried for illegal possession of a firearm. the judge ruled smith was not guilty because law enforcement failed to provide evidence about the gun's length and thus did not prove that smith's gun met the definition of a firearm. later, a witness had testified that smith's gun was a pistol, and the judge reversed and sent the possession charge to the jury. smith appealed and argued the judge's reversal of the not-guilty ruling on the possession charge violated his rights. which statement explains the constitutional provision behind smith's argument? a. individuals charged in criminal cases are protected against double jeopardy. b. individuals charged in criminal cases have the right to legal representation. c. the courts cannot force an individual to testify, or incriminate, themselves. d. the government has the right of eminent domain with just compensation.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50, mrme41
The provisions of subpart d, of the hhs regulations, additional protections for children involved as subjects in research apply to: all research involving childrenall research that is > minimal riskall research funded by any federal agencyall research funded by hhs
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30, ZachLaVine2016
Why did the settlement of east texas stop in the late 1710s
Answers: 1
Melvin t. smith was tried for illegal possession of a firearm. the judge ruled smith was not guilty...
Arts, 20.11.2021 14:00
Spanish, 20.11.2021 14:00
English, 20.11.2021 14:00